Industry solutions

Defence & Aerospace

Airworthiness is evidence, not opinion.

Defence and aerospace programmes run on proof: every failure rate traced to a source, every hazard closed with analysis, every safety claim ready for the certification authority. RAMSynapse keeps that proof connected — from allocation at contract award to FRACAS in service.

01

The evidence chain breaks between tools

Predictions in one tool, FMECAs in spreadsheets, fault trees somewhere else — by CDR nobody can show which safety claim rests on which failure rate.

02

Baselines move, analyses lag

Every design revision invalidates numbers that were retyped instead of linked. The safety case ages the moment the BOM changes.

03

Certification asks for traceability

MIL-STD-882 and ARP4761 reviews want the path from hazard to mitigation to verification — reconstructing it manually costs programme months.

The regulatory landscape

The standards, and the modules that carry them.

MIL-HDBK-217F

Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment

Part-stress failure-rate prediction for electronics — still the contractual baseline on most defence programmes.

PredictionDerating

MIL-STD-882E

System Safety

The DoD system-safety process: hazard identification, risk assessment and acceptance, tracked through the programme lifecycle.

FHAFault Tree

MIL-STD-1629A

FMECA

Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis — the failure-mode discipline defence customers still cite by number.

FMECATestability

ARP4754A / ARP4761

Civil Airborne Systems Development & Safety Assessment

FHA → PSSA → SSA: the civil aviation safety-assessment chain, with fault trees quantified against allocated budgets.

FHAFault TreeAllocation

MIL-HDBK-472

Maintainability Prediction

MTTR prediction and maintenance-burden analysis for fielded systems — the maintainability half of the RAMS case.

MaintainabilityMTALORA

DO-178C / DO-254

Software & Hardware Design Assurance

Development assurance levels are set by the safety assessment upstream — the FHA severities and fault-tree budgets RAMSynapse carries are what the DAL assignment stands on.

FHAFault Tree

A programme-typical chain

One model, every analysis.

How a defence programme runs the RAMS case on one system model — each result feeding the next analysis live, never retyped.

  1. Allocate the contract targetsAllocationBreak the system-level MTBF and safety targets down the BOM — every subsystem owner sees the budget they carry.
  2. Predict against MIL-HDBK-217FPredictionPart-stress predictions per LRU, compared live against the allocation — deviations surface the day the BOM changes.
  3. Run the MIL-STD-1629A FMECAFMECAFailure modes inherit the predicted rates automatically; criticality ranks itself against severity categories.
  4. Quantify the fault treesFault TreeTop events from the FHA, basic events fed by the same failure rates the FMECA uses — one source of truth for 882E risk acceptance.
  5. Close the loop in serviceFRACASField failures flow back through FRACAS; observed rates recalibrate predictions and re-age the safety case honestly.

Programme deliverables

The paperwork, generated.

The CDRL items a defence programme owes at every gate — produced from the live model, not reassembled from spreadsheets the week before the review.

MIL-STD-785B · MIL-HDBK-217F

Reliability Program Plan & Predictions

Allocation tables and part-stress predictions per configuration item, always reconciled with the current BOM baseline.

MIL-STD-1629A

FMECA Report

Worksheets, criticality matrices and single-point-failure lists generated from the same failure modes the fault trees consume.

MIL-STD-882E · ARP4761

Safety Assessment Report

Hazard log, quantified fault trees and residual-risk acceptance evidence, traceable from hazard to verification.

MIL-HDBK-472

Maintainability Prediction Report

MTTR roll-ups, maintenance task times and repair-level rationale from the maintainability chain.

R&M Status at SRR / PDR / CDR

Gate-ready scorecards: allocation vs. prediction vs. observed, per subsystem — the same numbers the registry carries, dated.

FRACAS Summaries

Field failure trends, corrective-action status and the recalibrated rates flowing back into the predictions.

Bring the certification authority a connected case.

See how a defence programme runs allocation, prediction, FMECA, fault trees and FRACAS on one shared system model — on your own infrastructure.