RAMSynapse
Log inSign up

Testability · Chapter 6

References

The public standards and primary documents this topic draws on.

The public standards, reports and primary documents this topic draws on. Every factual claim in the preceding chapters traces to one of these; the numeric examples (the weighted-coverage table, the ambiguity arithmetic, the rollup) are illustrative and belong to no source.

Standards and handbooks

  1. MIL-STD-2165, Testability Program for Electronic Systems and Equipments, US Department of Defense (Naval Electronic Systems Command), 26 January 1985 (the founding programme standard: the definition of testability, and the task structure spanning testability requirements, allocation, prediction/analysis, and demonstration).
  2. MIL-STD-2165A, Testability Program for Systems and Equipments, US Department of Defense, 1 February 1993; cancelled July 1995 (the revised task structure: diagnostic concepts and requirements, inherent testability design and assessment, test design and assessment).
  3. MIL-HDBK-2165, Testability Handbook for Systems and Equipment, US Department of Defense, 31 July 1995 (the guidance redesignation of MIL-STD-2165A; the ambiguity-group sizing and no-defect-found design guidance).
  4. IEC 60706-5:2007, Maintainability of equipment, Part 5: Testability and diagnostic testing, Edition 2.0, International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007 (testability considered early in design; diagnostic test procedures for operation and maintenance).
  5. MIL-STD-1309D, Definitions of Terms for Testing, Measurement, and Diagnostics, US Department of Defense, 12 February 1992 (the vocabulary behind built-in test, fault detection and isolation, and false alarms).
  6. IEEE Std 1149.1, IEEE Standard for Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture, IEEE; first edition 1990, latest revision IEEE Std 1149.1-2013 (the boundary-scan architecture known as JTAG).
  7. IEEE Std 1522-2004, IEEE Standard for Testability and Diagnosability Characteristics and Metrics, IEEE, 2004; issued for trial use and since withdrawn (the formal failure-rate-weighted detection and isolation metrics, including the expected percentage of faults detected).
  8. MIL-HDBK-470A, Designing and Developing Maintainable Products and Systems, Volume I, US Department of Defense, 4 August 1997 (dependency modelling as the system-level testability analysis, with the WSTA, STAT and STAMP tool family; diagnosis inside the corrective-maintenance time elements).
  9. MIL-HDBK-338B, Electronic Reliability Design Handbook, US Department of Defense, 1 October 1998 (fault localization and isolation among the corrective-maintenance steps; the maintainability arithmetic that consumes isolation resolution).

Industry reports

  1. ARINC Report 604-1, Guidance for Design and Use of Built-In Test Equipment (BITE), Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee), 1 October 1988 (the avionics BITE and centralized fault display guidance).
  2. ARINC Report 672, Guidelines for the Reduction of No Fault Found (NFF), ARINC Industry Activities (SAE ITC), 1 June 2008 (the structured NFF identification and root-cause process; the design connection to component and system testability).

For the repair-time arithmetic that consumes isolation resolution, see the Maintainability references; for the latent-unavailability ledger the undetected fraction feeds, see the Availability references.


Want to see this on a live system model? Request a walkthrough.